Supplier control
- Supplier profiles
- Vendor bank review
- Risk signals
- Supplier responses
We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Attempting to reconnect
Supply Chain And Operations
Supplier, requisition, purchase order, receipt, vendor-risk, and procurement evidence control.
| Area | Status | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Suppliers | Risk profiled | Bank-change audit |
| Purchase orders | Workflow controlled | Approval trail |
| Receipts | Warehouse handoff | Receiving evidence |
Core workflows
Each workflow is written as an operational path, not a marketing claim, so buyers can understand the day-to-day module fit.
Feature checklist
How this module exchanges business context with the rest of ERPStack.
| Module | Relationship |
|---|---|
| Inventory | Receipts, stock updates, and warehouse handoffs |
| Accounting | Accrual, invoice, and vendor payment evidence |
| Quality | Supplier quality checks and inspection exceptions |
| Security Operations | Vendor-bank and high-risk supplier incidents |
Controls and management visibility expected from a serious ERP module.
AI coverage policy
AI claims are tied to the official Agent Tool Registry, evaluation evidence, safe-mode controls, and scheduled-agent monitor readiness. Roadmap modules only show planned coverage until module-native tools are implemented.
AI L2 ready| Coverage claim | Current AI coverage: Procurement L2/L2 ready through the official Agent Tool Registry. |
|---|---|
| Governance evidence | Governance evidence: 2 registered tools, 2 evaluation cases, tenant/RBAC/safe-mode registry controls, and AI log evidence. |
| Scheduled monitor | Scheduled monitor readiness: 1/1 ready (Supplier Risk Monitor). |
| L4/L5 boundary | Remaining L4/L5 gap: no autonomous execution or self-optimizing agent behavior is claimed; write paths remain permissioned, previewed, and confirmable. |
Evidence-first standard
This page structure supports the current public module catalog with app-derived visuals, connected-module evidence, governance proof, and report context that can be compared against real product routes.
Buyers can see concrete function groups instead of vague capability claims.
Workflows, users, and connected modules show where the module belongs.
RBAC, audit, SIEM, approvals, and reporting are surfaced as first-class concerns.
Public pages link back to app routes so reviewers can compare page claims to product surfaces.