Leave request flow
- Employee requests
- Manager decisions
- Cancellation
- Amendment
Connexion Internet introuvable
Tentative de reconnexion
Une erreur est survenue !
Tentative de reconnexion
Flux de travail RH
Leave requests, balances, holidays, policy settings, approvals, calendars, imports, and workforce availability evidence.
| Domaine | Statut | Preuve |
|---|---|---|
| Demandes | Manager reviewed | Decision trail |
| Balances | Policy aware | Adjustment proof |
| Calendrier | Team visible | Availability view |
Workflows clés
Each workflow is written as an operational path, not a marketing claim, so buyers can understand the day-to-day module fit.
Feature checklist
How this module exchanges business context with the rest of ERPStack.
| Module | Relation |
|---|---|
| RH | Employee profiles, departments, and managers |
| Workflow | Leave approvals, cancellation, and amendment routing |
| Paie | Leave balances and payroll-period context |
| BI | Absence, balance, and workforce availability reporting |
Controls and management visibility expected from a serious ERP module.
AI coverage policy
AI claims are tied to the official Agent Tool Registry, evaluation evidence, safe-mode controls, and scheduled-agent monitor readiness. Roadmap modules only show planned coverage until module-native tools are implemented.
AI L3 ready| Coverage claim | Current AI coverage: Leave L3/L3 ready through the official Agent Tool Registry. |
|---|---|
| Governance evidence | Governance evidence: 5 registered tools, 7 evaluation cases, tenant/RBAC/safe-mode registry controls, and AI log evidence. |
| Scheduled monitor | Scheduled monitor readiness: not in the current proactive-agent monitor wave. |
| L4/L5 boundary | Remaining L4/L5 gap: no autonomous execution or self-optimizing agent behavior is claimed; write paths remain permissioned, previewed, and confirmable. |
Evidence-first standard
This page structure supports the current public module catalog with app-derived visuals, connected-module evidence, governance proof, and report context that can be compared against real product routes.
Buyers can see concrete function groups instead of vague capability claims.
Workflows, users, and connected modules show where the module belongs.
RBAC, audit, SIEM, approvals, and reporting are surfaced as first-class concerns.
Public pages link back to app routes so reviewers can compare page claims to product surfaces.