Document lifecycle
- ຫ້ອງສະໝຸດ
- Versions
- Record links
- ແມ່ແບບ
ບໍ່ພົບການເຊື່ອມຕໍ່ອິນເຕີເນັດ
ກຳລັງພະຍາຍາມເຊື່ອມຕໍ່ໃໝ່
ມີບາງຢ່າງຜິດພາດ!
ກຳລັງພະຍາຍາມເຊື່ອມຕໍ່ໃໝ່
ຫ່ວງໂສ້ອຸປະທານ ແລະ ການດຳເນີນງານ
Document management for controlled library, approvals, signatures, search, OCR, templates, retention, and audit evidence.
| ພື້ນທີ່ | ສະຖານະ | ຫຼັກຖານ |
|---|---|---|
| ຫ້ອງສະໝຸດ | Versioned | Record link |
| ການອະນຸມັດ | Queue driven | Decision audit |
| ການເກັບຮັກສາ | Lifecycle tracked | Hold release proof |
ຂັ້ນຕອນຫຼັກ
Each workflow is written as an operational path, not a marketing claim, so buyers can understand the day-to-day module fit.
Feature checklist
How this module exchanges business context with the rest of ERPStack.
| Module | ຄວາມສຳພັນ |
|---|---|
| ຄຸນນະພາບ | Certificates, inspections, and evidence documents |
| ໂຄງການ | Deliverable and governance evidence |
| ຄ່າໃຊ້ຈ່າຍ | Receipts, waivers, and claim evidence |
| ປະຕິບັດການຄວາມປອດໄພ | Approval, signature, and retention incidents |
Controls and management visibility expected from a serious ERP module.
AI coverage policy
AI claims are tied to the official Agent Tool Registry, evaluation evidence, safe-mode controls, and scheduled-agent monitor readiness. Roadmap modules only show planned coverage until module-native tools are implemented.
AI L3 ready| Coverage claim | Current AI coverage: Documents L3/L3 ready through the official Agent Tool Registry. |
|---|---|
| Governance evidence | Governance evidence: 3 registered tools, 4 evaluation cases, tenant/RBAC/safe-mode registry controls, and AI log evidence. |
| Scheduled monitor | Scheduled monitor readiness: not in the current proactive-agent monitor wave. |
| L4/L5 boundary | Remaining L4/L5 gap: no autonomous execution or self-optimizing agent behavior is claimed; write paths remain permissioned, previewed, and confirmable. |
Evidence-first standard
This page structure supports the current public module catalog with app-derived visuals, connected-module evidence, governance proof, and report context that can be compared against real product routes.
Buyers can see concrete function groups instead of vague capability claims.
Workflows, users, and connected modules show where the module belongs.
RBAC, audit, SIEM, approvals, and reporting are surfaced as first-class concerns.
Public pages link back to app routes so reviewers can compare page claims to product surfaces.